Time for a 64-bit ARM application? Other platfforms? |
Mersenneplustwo home page |
log in |
Message boards : Number crunching : Time for a 64-bit ARM application? Other platfforms?
Author | Message |
---|---|
There are both 32-bit and 64-bit x86 applications for Apple OS and Linux/x86, but so far the ARM application is only 32-bit and only for Linux/ARM | |
ID: 544 · Rating: 0 · rate:
![]() ![]() ![]() | |
It’s on my todo list, coincidentally… (a 64-bit ARM Linux app) [so definitely agree] | |
ID: 545 · Rating: 0 · rate:
![]() ![]() ![]() | |
…though I suppose I ought to add: | |
ID: 546 · Rating: 0 · rate:
![]() ![]() ![]() | |
I can vouch that the new 64-bit Linux/ARM 1.16 app is twice as fast as the 32-bit 1.15 app was on a 64-bit platform, what do I need to do to test the 64-bit Android app? Is signing up for the project on my Android 9 running Odroid-N2+ enough? | |
ID: 548 · Rating: 0 · rate:
![]() ![]() ![]() | |
There is no specific Android app - the idea is to use UserLAnd :) | |
ID: 549 · Rating: 0 · rate:
![]() ![]() ![]() | |
I can vouch that the new 64-bit Linux/ARM 1.16 app is twice as fast as the 32-bit 1.15 app was on a 64-bit platform A verification of the factor two faster under Linux was obtained when I switched my two Raspberry Pi 3 Model B's from 32-bit Raspbian Buster to 64-bit Bullseye Raspberry Pi OS. Computing times went down from 18,000 seconds to 9,000 seconds. ____________ ![]() | |
ID: 565 · Rating: 0 · rate:
![]() ![]() ![]() | |
Thanks for that benchmark Dirk. | |
ID: 566 · Rating: 0 · rate:
![]() ![]() ![]() | |
….mind you, I’ve got a holiday to Cambridge planned, from which I hope to bring home a Pi400 as a trophy! | |
ID: 567 · Rating: 0 · rate:
![]() ![]() ![]() | |
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Time for a 64-bit ARM application? Other platfforms?